Debating COVID-19: Science, Policy, and Politics
In this episode, hosts Andrea and Edward discuss various aspects of the impact of COVID-19, including the politicization of science and medicine during the pandemic. They delve into the controversy surrounding public health decisions and the prioritization of individual life over broader societal impact. The hosts express skepticism about the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and boosters, referencing their own experiences and concerns about vaccination mandates. They also critique the handling of COVID-19 in nursing homes and question the politicization of treatments such as ivermectin. Additionally, they examine the implications of the Alabama Supreme Court's ruling on frozen embryos and the new CDC guidelines for COVID-19, expressing differing opinions on these matters.
In this episode, hosts Andrea and Edward discuss various aspects of the impact of COVID-19, including the politicization of science and medicine during the pandemic. They delve into the controversy surrounding public health decisions and the prioritization of individual life over broader societal impact. The hosts express skepticism about the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and boosters, referencing their own experiences and concerns about vaccination mandates. They also critique the handling of COVID-19 in nursing homes and question the politicization of treatments such as ivermectin. Additionally, they examine the implications of the Alabama Supreme Court's ruling on frozen embryos and the new CDC guidelines for COVID-19, expressing differing opinions on these matters.
Resources
- Newsweek's "It's Time for the Scientific Community to Admit We Were Wrong About COVID and It Cost Lives | Opinion"
- Face masks made ‘little to no difference’ in preventing spread of COVID: study
- Anthony Fauci Fesses Up: It turns out the six-feet social-distancing rule had no scientific basis
- CDC ditches 5-day COVID isolation, argues COVID is becoming flu-like
- Warnings of the impact of fertility treatments in Alabama rush in after frozen embryo ruling
- Lawmakers file bills to address Alabama Supreme Court’s IVF ruling
Join our Locals Community
As a community member, you can see our feed and like our posts.
If you want to comment, reply, write posts, and engage with us directly, you can uplevel your membership by supporting our community.
For a limited time, the first 25 members who join will receive a free 30-day trial to support our show.
- Use promo code: FREEDOM
Our goal with our show and this community is to bring people together with different points of view and show each other mutual respect.
Don't forget to join at https://myfavoriteconservative.locals.com
[00:00] COVID-19 is becoming more like the flu with less specific rules.
[04:49] Debate over the effectiveness of widespread masking for COVID-19.
[07:03] Testimony to pandemic subcommittee discussed social distancing.
[13:26] Mandated vaccines often may cause illness and long COVID.
[18:46] Ivermectin was a legitimate treatment, though it's generic.
[22:46] Trust in science and medicine shattered by government.
[25:40] Public health decisions prioritize saving lives versus consequences.
[32:19 Both Trump and Biden lose the COVID debate.
[34:04] Alabama Supreme Court rules frozen embryos are children.
[38:05] Abortion should be a choice, not birth control.
[40:17] Alabama Republicans push bills on IVF, stating embryos are not life.
[45:02] Review our show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Podchaser.
